Guide · Real estate · Prospecting
Since 11 August 2026, a French agency can only call a private seller who said yes beforehand. Here is the rule read in the text, the exception almost everyone wrongly applies to real estate, the form that is now your legal line, and the channels that take the place of cold calling.
The uncomfortable fact
The decree's 5-day callback rule is reserved for energy renovation. Estate agencies cannot rely on it.
In short
11 Aug 2026
Prior consent becomes mandatory for telephone canvassing of private individuals
Law n° 2025-594 of 30 June 2025, article 13, Légifrance
1 year
Maximum duration of a consent, with no tacit renewal
Decree n° 2026-662 of 23 July 2026, article R. 223-1
3 years
How long the agency must keep proof of consent
Decree n° 2026-662, article R. 223-2
€75,000
Maximum fine "per call" for an individual, €375,000 for a company
DGCCRF, practical sheet written 27 July 2026
The text
Law n° 2025-594 of 30 June 2025, in its article 13, rewrote the article. It now forbids canvassing by telephone, directly or through a third party, any consumer who has not first consented to commercial prospecting by that means. The burden of proving consent sits with the professional.
A seller who lists a flat on a portal acts as a private individual, which makes them a consumer under the text. Calling them to offer a mandate means contacting them "with a view to concluding a contract", the definition the DGCCRF uses in its 27 July 2026 sheet. Cold calling sellers is therefore covered, whatever portal the listing came from.
| Rule | What the text requires | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Consent | Prior, free, specific, informed, unambiguous, revocable, given by a clear positive act | L. 223-1 |
| Proof | On the agency, kept for 3 years | L. 223-1, R. 223-2 |
| Duration | 1 year at most, no tacit renewal | R. 223-1 |
| Hours | Monday to Friday except public holidays, 10am to 1pm and 2pm to 8pm | DGCCRF, 27 July 2026 |
| Frequency | No more than 4 calls in 30 days to the same consumer | DGCCRF, 27 July 2026 |
| Contract signed after an unlawful call | Void | L. 223-1, last paragraph |
Agencies underestimate the last row. The Consumer Code states that any contract concluded with a consumer following unlawful telephone canvassing is void. For an agency, that contract is the mandate. MySweetImmo summed it up on 9 June 2026: a disputed mandate means a fragile sale and a threatened commission. The fine is the visible risk. The void mandate is the one that costs a sale.
What almost nobody writes
Article R. 223-4 opens with a qualifier that settles the question: it applies "for the application of the fifth paragraph of article L. 223-1". That fifth paragraph is the one that bans canvassing outright for energy renovation and home adaptation. The decree's explanatory note, published in the Journal officiel of 25 July 2026, says the same: consumers may be called at their express request for those products and services, provided the callback happens quickly.
The DGCCRF sheet of 27 July 2026 files this callback under the question "In which fields is telephone canvassing totally banned?". Agencies that read "callbacks within five days are allowed" in a summary and apply it to their valuation requests are relying on an exception that does not concern them.
The consequence is concrete. A seller who fills in a "get your home valued" form does not automatically agree to be called. What makes the call safe is what the form contains, which is the next section. We are not lawyers: have your form checked by your legal adviser or your trade body.
In practice
The five items of article R. 223-1, applied to a valuation form:
Two technical duties follow. The agency must archive, for three years, the text shown, the date and time of consent, and the agreed slot if the call falls outside legal hours (article R. 223-2). And the new article L. 223-2 requires informing anyone whose phone number you collect that commercial calls require their consent. A CRM that timestamps the checkbox and stores the exact wording does this work; a shared spreadsheet does it badly.
Alternatives
| Channel | Status since 11 August 2026 | What it takes | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inbound requests (website, online valuation) | Open, calls allowed with collected consent | A site people find, a compliant form, a fast reply | Slow to build, then steady |
| Visibility in AI assistants | Open | Pages that answer real questions, a consistent identity | Slow, not guaranteed |
| Addressed mail | Outside the telephone text | A lawful list, a right to object, a cost per letter | Immediate |
| Door-to-door, leafleting | Outside the telephone text | Time in the field | Immediate |
| Referrers (notaries, property managers, assessors) | Business to business, outside the Consumer Code | A real relationship. GDPR: information and right to object | Slow, then lasting |
| Clients under an ongoing contract | Exception in L. 223-1 | A call related to the contract | Immediate, limited volume |
| Prospecting email or SMS to a private individual | Already consent-based (L. 34-5 CPCE) | Prior agreement | Not applicable without consent |
Mail and referrers deserve a note. Mail works if the list is lawful and targeted, for instance properties whose energy rating will restrict letting. Referrers work if the relationship is real and maintained. We cover what lasts in our guide on the data an estate agency should own.
The main channel
The work has little to do with a shop window. A site that brings in sellers answers the questions they actually ask in your area: price per square metre on their street, the time sales take, what the energy performance certificate changes for their property, which documents to prepare. One page per question, answered in full, with your own figures. A three-paragraph "estate agency + town" page answers none of them.
Assistants add a constraint. Google documents a "query fan-out" mechanism: its AI answers split a question into several searches before responding. A page that fully answers one sub-question has a chance of being used. We wrote a whole guide on this, how to make an estate agency visible in ChatGPT, covering what an agency controls and what no provider can sell it.
One last point, often missed: inbound demand is lost when nobody answers. A seller who fills in a form at 9pm on a Tuesday may fill in three more that evening. The agency that replies first, in writing and then by phone once consent is there, gets ahead.
Time freed up
In practice, four tasks delegate well. Replying to a valuation request in writing within a minute, with the first questions about the property. Writing the viewing report from the agent's notes and sending it to the seller. Following up with buyers after a viewing. Updating the transaction software, which otherwise happens late at night or not at all. We detail what holds up in production in the five AI automations that hold up in an estate agency.
An AI agent that places calls itself is still bound by the canvassing rules, and the CNIL already requires consent for prospecting private individuals with automated calling. We cover that case in our guide to AI phone receptionists and outbound calls. The best return lies elsewhere: an instant written reply, then the agent's own call once the seller has said yes. That is the journey we build in the intelligent CRM for real estate.
Limits
Time. A site that attracts sellers is built page by page. Nobody publishes a reliable timeline, and a provider promising a precise one is selling a guess. Mail and fieldwork cover the transition.
Expiry. A one-year consent is not a permanent list. A seller who has not sold within the year must agree again before another call.
Material. An assistant recommends what it has read about. If your agency is mentioned nowhere but its own site, the levers are outside it: local press, real reviews, partners.
The law. This page reads the texts as of 9 October 2026 and is not legal advice. The first sanctions and case law will settle the grey areas, notably calling back a seller who asked to be contacted without ticking a box.
Method
For the overall picture of AI projects in the sector, see our guide on AI in real estate, and for who does what on the market, our comparison of AI providers for real estate.
FAQ
Related guides
The direct follow-on: being found when the seller asks an assistant.
What the agent can delegate once cold calling stops.
Collected consent becomes an asset, as long as you keep it in-house.
The rules that apply when an AI answers or places calls.
Links verified at publication. Regulatory texts change — always defer to the official source.
A question, a project, an idea? We respond within 24h. Free audit, no commitment.